On a historic building, what is at stake is the safety of those who live in it, visit it or work there, and the conservation of heritage that cannot be replaced. These are structures built without seismic criteria, altered over the centuries and often still in use, where degradation advances slowly and without evident signs. BBOX 2.0 makes it measurable and turns the measurement into a report signed by a structural engineer.
Historic palaces, churches, theatres, museums, towers and bell towers, listed buildings used as offices or schools: different contexts, the same underlying condition. Rotations, settlement and material decay progress at a pace that a periodic inspection struggles to quantify: the crack is visible, and how fast it is advancing remains to be established.
On protected buildings every intervention has to be justified to the heritage authorities, and arriving with measured evidence rather than an impression changes the conversation. Continuous structural monitoring makes conservation a process informed by data.
The Directive of the President of the Council of Ministers of 9 February 2011, which sets out the guidelines for assessing and reducing seismic risk for cultural heritage, recognises monitoring among the tools for tracking how structural damage evolves and for planning conservation work. Continuous measurements document that evolution with data that remains on record.
One hardware setup covers two needs: following the building day by day and knowing how it reacted to an earthquake.
On slender structures inclination is the first indicator, and comparing the building against its own history replaces reference to an abstract model.
On towers, bell towers and slender structures, inclination is provided by the base configuration itself, and how it evolves over time is the first indicator of settlement in progress.
Changes in dynamic characteristics signal degradation, with compensation for environmental effects separating real movement from fluctuations caused by temperature and humidity, which on historic masonry are far from negligible.
The datalogger accepts several types of sensor: advanced inclinometers, crack gauges, strain gauges, distance meters and environmental sensors.
The response recorded during the tremor, available when quick decisions are needed.
During a tremor the system records the real response of the structure, and that data supports a timely assessment of its condition and of the priorities for making it safe.
The recorded data indicates which parts to focus inspections and safety works on, and constitutes technical documentation of the event to present to the heritage authorities.
One hardware setup covers two needs: following the building day by day and knowing how it reacted to an earthquake.
How structural monitoring works →What reaches the desk of those who decide is a report interpreted and signed by a structural engineer, in two forms.
The periodic SHM report documents the evolution of the building's condition with reliable data and gives heritage authorities and conservation plans objective evidence on which to base their decisions.
The post-event report captures the condition of the building after an earthquake and sets out the measured response of the structure, with the elements needed to establish priorities for making it safe.
Representative installations include the bell tower of the church of San Nicola di Bari in Camposanto, in the province of Modena: a sixteenth-century building severely damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake and restored in 2016. Four accelerometer sensors follow its inclination over time and detect its seismic response, providing objective technical data in support of preventive conservation.
The MOSI team is available for tailored technical advice.
Request a consultation